<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cultivate Search Engine Positioning, Inc. &#187; compelling content</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cultivateseo.com/blog/tag/compelling-content/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cultivateseo.com/blog</link>
	<description>Search Engine Marketing Tips and Tricks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 23:14:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Converting Content vs. SEO</title>
		<link>http://cultivateseo.com/blog/converting-content-vs-seo-136</link>
		<comments>http://cultivateseo.com/blog/converting-content-vs-seo-136#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Keyword Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On-Page Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organic Traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compelling content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keyword density]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cultivateseo.com/?p=136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The center stage of this battle ground between Search Engine Marketers and Marketing firms is simply this: is conversion more important than traffic.  &#8220;Content is King&#8221; exclaims the marketing firms whilst &#8220;Get the traffic then worry about conversion&#8221; is the overall tone of Search Engine Marketers.  So who&#8217;s right, is content truly king and search [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The center stage of this battle ground between Search Engine Marketers and Marketing firms is simply this: is conversion more important than traffic.  &#8220;Content is King&#8221; exclaims the marketing firms whilst &#8220;Get the traffic then worry about conversion&#8221; is the overall tone of Search Engine Marketers.  So who&#8217;s right, is content truly king and search engine optimization is nothing more than &#8216;gaming&#8217; the SERPs?  Or are the search engine marketers correct in thinking that the &#8216;if you build it they will come&#8217; philosophy simply isn&#8217;t true in todays world; optimize first then convert.  Let&#8217;s dig into the heated debate and see if we can come to a conclusion or at the very least a compromise.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><em>It should be noted, this <strong>is</strong> an SEO blog so while I will try to be as neutral as possible my opinions certainly lead toward SEO.</em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Compelling content is the name of the game.</strong><br />
You need to speak with the consumer, relate to them on the level they are at.  If they&#8217;re looking for a replacement blender chances are they&#8217;re not going to search for &#8220;replacement blender&#8221; but &#8220;my blender broke, what&#8217;s a good replacement&#8221;.  Marketing firms state that loading keywords into the content will put off the consumer and you will see your conversion rates tank.</p>
<p>One topic that often comes up is that search engine marketers load keywords and use their &#8216;tricks&#8217; to manipulate the search engines for their own profit.  They will say that if all things were equal the website with the best content should and would always win out.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Optimizing for search brings the customers to you.</strong><br />
Compelling content may be higher converting but if you convert 90% of your visitors but if your total visitors is 100 a month versus 50% of 1,000 a month surely a lower conversion rate for a higher share is better.  The bottom line should be total conversions not percentages right?</p>
<p>Seeking out new developing niche markets can allow you to rank for new phrases quickly with good on-page optimization and thus driving more leads to your website.  You need optimized content to drive that traffic, then you can worry about converting.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>My thoughts/conclusion: meeting in the middle.</strong><br />
Sure it might be a cop out to say meet in the middle but the reality is good news: you don&#8217;t have to compromise the copy much to rank well.  Too often search engine optimizers will get nailed down to a set philosophy.  We live and breathe numbers; whether it&#8217;s keyword density or number of incoming links.  We think in literals: we&#8217;re either optimized or we&#8217;re not.  And it doesn&#8217;t have to be that way.  All you need to do is be a little better than the guy at the top, have a little better link portfolio, and you can easily rank for the up and coming niche markets without butchering the content.</p>
<p>Content is king, but if it&#8217;s not seen it doesn&#8217;t matter.  However, you don&#8217;t have to compromise that content.  Maybe give a list of keyword phrases to the marketers and see if they can naturally slip them in.  Don&#8217;t get bogged down by keyword density.  Marketers, you are not diluting your final product by trying to fit in a few keywords the optimizers give you.  Your business is compelling copy, you are blessed with a wide vocabulary, surely you can fit in a few keywords where you think they fit.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s face it, the marketers are here to stay and guess what, so are the search engine optimizers, so let&#8217;s find a way to work together.  Understand that the marketers probably know things you as an optimizer do not and vice versa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cultivateseo.com/blog/converting-content-vs-seo-136/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
